Bedoya M/ Enfermería Investiga Vol. 8 No. 4 2024 (December - January)
21
INTRODUCTION
Sexual and reproductive health (SRH), like health in general, is
determined by various factors. Even though its correspondence
with the biological is obvious, the mediation of the social and
cultural context is essential (1-3). While biological bodies function
in certain ways, gender and the representations rooted in
patriarchal societies establish their own models of health,
science and behavior, with an impact on individual and collective
bodies (4). In this debate, women's rights have been
progressively recognized, without difficulty. The ideology of
femininity and the notions that it entails have permeated health
practices, as well as the process of health-illness-care-attention-
death (5), with latent threats and risks of violation of the
fundamental rights of women.
The attention regarding their SRH continues to be limited, with
poor quality, characterized by dependence on decisions of third
parties or institutions, and persistence of practices without
consent, based on logics of legitimized violence (6). The origin of
these systematic violations is found in the deep-rooted
representations and concepts around women, gender, sexuality
and their essential functions of gestating, giving birth,
breastfeeding, raising and revitalizing others in a personal, direct
and permanent way, in their daily survival and in death (7-9).
Within all these ideas, that of motherhood is covered with moral
judgments, whether religious, political or cultural. In some cases,
it is considered sacred and constant (10), but paradoxically
underestimated, as an instinctive response, which occurs
spontaneously and therefore has no value (8). The vision of “the
mother” is presented as a naturalized reflection of love,
unconditionality and, with it, the loss of autonomy of women (10),
conceptions that are inscribed in their bodies and lives, with
strong conservative and sexist aspects.
In this context, the exercise of women's fundamental rights may
be restricted, in particular sexual and reproductive rights, the
purpose of which is to guarantee that all people can live free of
discrimination, risks, threats, coercion and violence in relevant
decisions. So that they can enjoy a pleasurable, sovereign and
free sexual and reproductive life. This is reflected, among other
situations, in the norms and health practices provided by
professionals in the area, and ends up being expressed in the
setback in matters of SRH (11), where the autonomy of women
continues to be limited and widely debated.
Against this backdrop, abortion is one of the problems that
cannot be resolved. The criminalization and judicialization of
those who have performed abortions has increased in Ecuador.
The context of this research is pressured from various social
sectors to regulate the issue in line with international
organizations that point out violations of other associated rights,
such as health or intimacy (12).
Following these debates, this article aims to understand the way
motherhood is understood from the trajectories of women who
have decided to abort in Ecuador, that is, from the trajectories of
those women.
METHODS
Type of study. This work was situated in a feminist perspective,
a world view that recognizes women in society and confronts
systematic injustices based on gender (13). This philosophical
current promotes a social transformation in the contemporary
world, generating critical and reflective judgments capable of
changing realities (14), while calling into question the discourses,
dilemmas and problems that have not been answered. It aims to
create a science free of gender inequality, with a vision of
inclusion. Accordingly, the research is qualitative, it had a design
based on the narrative biographical approach (15) given the
relevance of understanding from the subjectivity of women the
phenomena that are intertwined with their SRH (16).
Place and Period. Ecuador, from March 2021 to March 2022
Selection criteria. Women of legal age who had decided to abort
at some point in their lives, who wanted to narrate their
experience freely and whose geographical area of residence was
Ecuador. Those with communication difficulties were excluded.
The approach to the participants was through contacts and social
networks, under the snowball strategy and through organizations
and activists that work for the defense of sexual and reproductive
rights, among them: Feministas Ec, Colectivo Zorras
Subversivas and the Blue Toad Community. A first contact was
established with the women to inform them about the objectives
of the research, informed consent and ethical safeguards, in
addition to completing a sociodemographic data sheet.
Sample. The sample was made up of 19 women between 18 and
62 years old, with an average of 32; residents of Quito, Jipijapa,
Portoviejo, Latacunga, Guayaquil and Atuntaqui. 47% were
university students, 35% were professionals from different
disciplines and 18% were housewives, which formed a sample
with significant access to education. Almost all declared their
ideological and practical adherence to the Catholic religion. The
sample was formed following the logic of convenience sampling
and achieving the formation of a homogeneous sample, with
minimal variation.