Usefulness of scales to improve the diagnostic suspicion of acute appendicitis in the Emergency room of the Hospital General Puyo, 2021

Main Article Content

Anderson Robalino Díaz
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2250-7649
Carolina Carrillo Medina
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1119-9513
Mirian Sandoval Castañeda
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4429-7259
Margarita Recalde Paredes
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0014-4851
Mireya Alvarado Cajas
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6630-892X
Katherine Valencia Chunllo
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4651-5523
María Chiliquinga Cando
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8621-4207
Luis Sánchez Vaca
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0215-6207
María Ordoñez Saetama
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-4675
Aida Ruíz Chicaiza
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4788-8890
Flor Santiago Paguay
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6818-7081
Petita Torres Bayas
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5382-5634

Abstract

Context: Over the years, several scales have been developed to support the diagnosis and predict the severity of cases with a framework suggestive of acute appendicitis. In this investigation, these scales are compared.


Objective: To determine the degree of diagnostic certainty of the Alvarado and RIPASA scales as diagnostic support for Acute Appendicitis, at Hospital General Puyo, from 2021 to December 2021.


Methodology: Analytical, comparative, retrospective research, with diagnostic accuracy. Population and sample: Clinical histories of 105 adult patients admitted with a diagnosis of acute appendicitis during the study period. The SPSS v25.0 program was used, sensitivity (S), specificity (E), predictive values (PPV and NPV), likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), diagnostic OR (ORD), 95% CI and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves. As reference questions, the criterion of the surgeon and the histopathological examination were taken. To compare both curves, the Hanley and McNeil statistics were used.


Results: Diagnostic accuracy: Alvarado: Sensitivity: 49.0% (35.9%-62.3%), Specificity: 50.0% (37.1%-62.9%); Positive Predictive Value: 48.1% (34.2%-62.2%); Negative Predictive Value: 50.9% (37.0-64.7%), Positive Likelihood Ratio: 0.9 (0.7-1.4), Negative Likelihood Ratio: 1.0 (0.7 -1.5); Odds diagnostic ratio: 0.9 (0.4-2.1), Area under the curve: 51.8% (40.6%-63.0%). RIPASA: Sensitivity: 76.5% (62.2%-86.7%), Specificity: 12.9% (5.8%-25.5%), Positive Predictive Value: 45.3% (34.7 %-56.4%), Negative Predictive Value: 36.8% (17.2%-61.4%), Positive Likelihood Ratio: 0.88 (0.73-1.06), Negative Likelihood Ratio: 1.82 (0.78-4.25), Odds diagnostic ratio: 0.48 (0.17-1.35), Area under the curve: 60.8% (49.7%-71.9%).


Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the RIPASA and Alvarado scales in relation to the diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis at the Hospital General de Puyo. In both cases, the performance was “discrete”; but, due to the characteristics of the show, this finding should not be generalized

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Robalino Díaz , A. ., Carrillo Medina , C., Sandoval Castañeda, M. ., Recalde Paredes , M. ., Alvarado Cajas , M., Valencia Chunllo , K., … Torres Bayas , P. . (2023). Usefulness of scales to improve the diagnostic suspicion of acute appendicitis in the Emergency room of the Hospital General Puyo, 2021. Mediciencias UTA, 7(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.31243/mdc.uta.v7i2.1988.2023
Section
Original research article

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.