DIAGNOSIS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT AT THE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF AMBATO
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Introduction: In general, university laboratories can be characterized as a polluting source, as they use several chemical substances that are potentially harmful to the environment and human health in the development of their academic activities. Therefore, proper handling of chemical products and management of waste generated are necessary for environmental safety. Objective: make a diagnosis respect to the management of hazardous waste at the Technical University of Ambato. Methods: it’s a quantitative, descriptive and cross-sectional study, in which 41 laboratories generating hazardous waste were selected. A survey was applied based on the current technical regulations of the Ministry of the Environment of Peru, with 3 sections, and the results were analyzed in the SPSS 24.0 program. Results: at the laboratories of the university predominates the generation of infectious residues in the School of Health Sciences and construction in the School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, the number of containers is insufficient for generation demand or does not meet the needs (80.50%), sharps are segregated in rigid containers (75.60%), waste is not disposed of according its class (68.30%), central storage is far from medical and food services (61.00%), no treatment or final disposal is carried out by specialized companies (80.50%). Conclusions: the laboratories have an appropriate internal waste management, they have covered containers, the sharps are appropriately segregated, there is a correct middle storage. However, in the external management of hazardous waste, there aren’t routes or timetables for transport, no treatment or collect is carried out through an specialized company.
KEYWORDS: hazardous waste, diagnosis, laboratories, waste management, universities, environment.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Citas
2. Ssemugabo C, Tsebeni S, Biyinzika G, Ndejjo R, Osuret J, Halage A, et al. Status of Household Solid Waste Management and Associated Factors in a Slum Community in Kampala, Uganda. J Environ Public Health. 2020; 2020(1): 1- 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6807630
3. Hernández S, Corredor L. Reflexiones sobre la importancia económica y ambiental del manejo de residuos en el siglo XXI. Rev Tec. 2016;15(1):57-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18270/rt.v15i1.2039.
4. Pourzamani H, Darvishmotevalli M, Akhyari S, Hadi S, Momeni F, Bakhtiyari S, et al. Method for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of hazardous waste in laboratories of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Iran. MethodsX. 2019;6:377-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2019.02.012
5. Luna A, Lozoya L, González G. Potencial de residuos industriales generados en Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, México, como combustibles alternos en un horno cementero. Rev Int Contam Ambie. 2019;35(3):713 - 722. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20937/rica.2019.35.03.16
6. Rodríguez J, García C, García M. Gestión ambiental en hospitales públicos: aspectos del manejo ambiental en Colombia. Rev Fac Med. 2016;64(4):621 - 624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v64n4.54772
7. Rodrigues de Oliveira A, Cheble A, Wotzasek J, Krauss T. Gerenciamento de resíduos em laboratórios de uma universidade pública brasileira: um desafio para a saúde ambiental e a saúde do trabalhador. Saúde debate. 2020;43(3):63-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042019S305
8. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos I. Según la última estadística de información ambiental: Cada ecuatoriano produce 0,58 kilogramos de residuos sólidos al día. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos. 2018. Available in: https://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/segun-la-ultima-estadistica-de-informacion-ambiental-cada-ecuatoriano-produce-058-kilogramos-de-residuos-solidos-al-dia/
9. Mora A, Molina M. Diagnóstico del manejo de residuos sólidos en el parque histórico guayaquil. lGR. 2017;26(2):84 - 105. DOI: http://doi.org/10.17163/lgr.n26.2017.08
10. Ramos M, Tacle P. Manejo de los Desechos en los Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico del Cantón Ambato. La U Investiga. 2017;4(1):20-28. Available in: http://revistasojs.utn.edu.ec/index.php/lauinvestiga/article/view/244
11. Mejía A, Medina F, Martínez S, Huerta F. Manejo de los desechos peligrosos generados por los laboratorios de práctica docente de la Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias de la Universidad Técnica de Babahoyo. Prosciences. 2019;3(29):128 - 139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29018/issn.2588-1000vol3iss29.2019pp128-139
12. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Desechos de las actividades de atención sanitaria. 2018. Available in: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/health-care-waste
13. Ochoa M. Gestión integral de residuos: Análisis normativo y herramientas para su implementación. Segunda edición. Editorial Universidad del Rosario; 2018. 143 p.
14. Sánchez L. Edición Especial No 316 - Registro O?cial. 2015;80. Available in: https://www.gob.ec/sites/default/files/regulations/2018-09/Documento_acuerdo-ministerial-061.pdf
15. Mex Álvarez R, Garma-Quen P, León J. Manejo de residuos peligrosos biológicos e infecciosos en una escuela de química de nivel superior. RIDE. 2020;10(20). DOI: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v10i20.651
16. Mejía L, Romero L, Beltrán V. Residuos peligrosos hospitalarios en casa: una amenaza emergente. Rev cienc cuidad. 2016;13(1):87 - 102. Available in: https://revistas.ufps.edu.co/index.php/cienciaycuidado/article/view/737
17. Leoneti, AB, Vitorino, D; Silva, RS; Ferreira, A; Pimenta, A; Oliveira, S. Process management framework for chemical waste treatment laboratories. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 26 No. 2, 2020, pp. 447-462. DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-06-2019-0233
18. Salinas P. Los desechos sólidos, residuos o basura, un problema mundial para la salud y el ambiente. MedULA. 2019;28(1):35-38. Available in: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7084083
19. Rodríguez J, García C, Zafra C. Residuos hospitalarios: indicadores de tasas de generación en Bogotá, D.C. 2012-2015. Rev Fac Med. 2016;64(4):625 - 628. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v64n4.54770
20. Reyes A, Benítez M, Fraga A. La disposición de los desechos peligrosos: un desafío para la seguridad biológica. Acta Médica del Centro. 2016;10(1):64-67. Available in: http://www.revactamedicacentro.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/339
21. Orjuela P, Moreno E, Murillo W. Manejo de residuos peligrosos y desarrollo de cultura ambiental en la Universidad Manuela Beltrán. Revista Electrónica en Educación y Pedagogía. 2018;2(3):93-107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15658/rev.electron.educ.pedagog18.09020307
22. Mugabi B, Hattingh S, Chima SC. Assessing knowledge, attitudes, and practices of healthcare workers regarding medical waste management at a tertiary hospital in Botswana: A cross-sectional quantitative study. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018 Dec;21(12):1627-1638. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_270_17. PMID: 30560828.
23. Letho Z, Yangdon T, Lhamo C, Limbu C, Yoezer S, Jamtsho T, et al. Awareness and practice of medical waste management among healthcare providers in National Referral Hospital. PLoS One. 2021;16(1): 1- 10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243817
24. Wu H, Tao F, Yang B. Optimization of Vehicle Routing for Waste Collection and Transportation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 9;17(14):4963. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17144963. PMID: 32660117; PMCID: PMC7400456.
25. Melaku HS, Tiruneh MA. Occupational Health Conditions and Associated Factors Among Municipal Solid Waste Collectors in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov 3;13:2415-2423. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S276790. PMID: 33173365; PMCID: PMC7648532.
26. Peng H, Bilal M, Iqbal HMN. Improved Biosafety and Biosecurity Measures and/or Strategies to Tackle Laboratory-Acquired Infections and Related Risks. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 29;15(12):2697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122697. PMID: 30501091; PMCID: PMC6313313.
27. Guevara G, Verdesoto A, Castro N. Metodologías de investigación educativa (descriptivas, experimentales, participativas, y de investigación-acción). RECIMUNDO. 2020;4(3):163-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26820/recimundo/4.(3).julio.2020.163-173
28. Cadena P, Rendón R, Aguilar J, Salinas E, Cruz F, Sangerman D. Métodos cuantitativos, métodos cualitativos o su combinación en la investigación: un acercamiento en las ciencias sociales. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas. 2017;8(7):1603-1617. Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=263153520009
29. Manzano R, García H. Sobre los criterios de inclusión y exclusión. Más allá de la publicación. Rev Chil Pediatr. 2016;87(6):511-512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rchipe.2016.05.003
30. Nolasco E, Vieira P, Pereira V, Oliveira M, Abreu L, Nascimento A. Characterization of solid wastes as a tool to implement waste management strategies in a university campus Solid wastes as a tool. International Journal of Sustainability. 2020;22(2):217-236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-12-2019-0358
31. Talsania P, Modi N. An Assessment of Solid Waste Management Practices and Awareness in School of Science Gujarat University. International Journal of Research in Advent Technology. 2019;7(3):1295-1298. DOI: http://www.doi.org/10.32622/ijrat.732019126
32. Fagnani E, Guimaraes J. Waste management plan for higher education institutions in developing countries: The Continuous Improvement Cycle model. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;147(1):108-118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.080
33. Alberguini, Leny Borghesan A., Silva, Luis Carlos, & Rezende, Maria Olímpia Oliveira. Laboratório de resíduos químicos do campus USP-São Carlos: resultados da experiência pioneira em gestão e gerenciamento de resíduos químicos em um campus universitário. Química Nova. 2003;26(2): 291-295. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-40422003000200026
34. Moqbel S. Solid Waste Management in Educational Institutions: The Case of The University of Jordan. EREM. 2018;74(2):23-33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.erem.74.2.21037
35. Stanford © Universidad de, Stanford, autor C 94305 Q de derechos de. Normas de laboratorio y pautas de diseño: salud y seguridad medioambiental de Stanford. 2010. Disponible en: https://ehs.stanford.edu/manual/laboratory-standard-design-guidelines